Quantcast
Channel: The Oak Island Compendium - Blockhouse Blog
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 72

10X - Some inconvenient facts

$
0
0
Picture
Dan Blankenship preparing blasting charge
by John Wonnacott P. Eng. - Contributing Writer
  The bedrock cavity at the bottom of 10X is definitely man-made, but that doesn’t mean what you might think. It wasn’t built many years ago by people trying to hide treasure or secrets.

There is a cavity in the bedrock at the bottom of 10X, from approximately 217 feet down to about the 233 foot depth. It’s irregular in shape, described by various observers as being up to 20 or 25 feet wide, but the best data (1) indicates that in 1973 it was about 8 feet wide more or less, at the middle, and the cavity tapered to a smaller width at the top and the bottom.
  Since 1973 it’s possible that some rock may have fallen from the roof of the cavern, and it’s also possible that debris from further up in the shaft may have fallen into the cavity, piling up on the floor. So the shape and height of the cavity today may be a bit different from what it was in 1973.
  This cavity has been the target of many dives, camera inspections, and sonic investigations and it appears that more work may be planned at 10X for the future. But people who are serious about resolving some of Oak Island’s mysteries should understand the history of the shaft we now call 10X.

  During the summer and fall of 1969, the Triton Alliance had been drilling a series of exploratory boreholes in the vicinity of the Money Pit, when Dan Blankenship used his dowsing skills to find an apparent anomaly about 180 feet northeast of the Money Pit. That became the location for Borehole 10.  In those days Dan was supervising all the work at site, and he reported periodically to David Tobias in Montreal.  Here is Dan Blankenship’s Nov 29, 1969 report to Tobias. It’s a bit long, but if you will bear with me, you’ll see how important it is to report Blankenship’s exact words:
 
“Hole #10: 181 feet east of #24 (2), by the door of the old Restall house.

We started with a 9 inch rock bit
(3) and went very fast through overburden and glacial till. We hit a small cavity from 140 feet to 143 feet and another from 165 feet to 169 feet (4) and hit bedrock at 185 feet of gypsum (5).  We drove 10 feet into bedrock with the 9 inch bit and stopped at 195 feet at which point we put on the 6 inch rock bit in order to leave a shelf in case we hit a cavity, for our casing to seat into (6).  We drilled down to 195 feet at which point his hydraulic motor for his rotary head broke. He pulled 25 feet off the bottom and it stayed for 5 days until he had a new motor. When we continued, we hit a cavity at 230 feet to 233 feet (7).  I was standing there and my orders were to stop the rotary immediately when he hit a cavity.  This he did, and lowered the drill until it stopped at 233 feet with no turning. He then pulled the bit out and put on his 6 inch core barrel 22 feet long which is supposed to take a 3 inch core. At this time there wasn’t any casing in the hole, so in order to get the core barrel down to the bottom without getting clogged with the debris in the hole, Bowmaster (8) tied a red rag on the end of the bit with wire and lowered it to 233 feet, at which time he turned his air on which operates at high pressure and started turning his drill.  He cored for about 1 foot to 234 feet and because he wasn’t getting his return (9) back decided to pull out and see what was in the core barrel.  Only a few pieces of gypsum were there, and so we pulled out of the hole and went down to do hole #9.

After #9 was finished I talked Bowmaster into casing the hole
[Author’s note: meaning Hole #10] in lieu of the second hole which he owed me.

He put down 124 feet of casing before it stopped and hung up. He put the 6 inch rock drill inside and drilled to 150 feet. The casing then went to 148 feet before it hung up again, at which time he again put the drill back down into the casing and drilled. At this time Joe Stein
(10) came onto the site and was present.  Bowmaster was using air and the return was very good.  I was collecting the return that was coming out and I noticed bits of rag and small pieces of metal (11). This metal and rags came up from about 166 feet to 175 feet. It is very important to note at this time a lot of water was coming up and upon tasting it I discovered it was salt. We collected a quart bottle of it and Joe Stein took it back to the laboratory with him.

We continued drilling down to 198 feet and then drove the casing to 178 feet. While driving this, the last piece of casing broke off 14 feet below ground level. The next day I took the samples to Halifax and we had a conference call that evening. Friday, the next day I used a backhoe and dug down and cut the casing. Not having a welder, I put a 16 foot long piece of 8 inch diameter casing over the 6 inch and back filled in preparation for Warnock-Hersey
(12). Friday evening they came and unloaded gear and set up.

Saturday they came and started dropping 3 ½ inch casing inside Bowmaster’s 6 inch casing and it went easy to about 212 feet at which time they started drilling it down. They then put a roller cone bit on and drilled inside of their casing. The drilling was hard at first and then eased up, breaking through of its own weight at about 218 feet
(13). [Please be sure to read footnote #13].  The 3.5 inch casing was then turned for about 1.5 inches into bedrock, which interesting enough was 237.5 feet. This measurement was exact. I went back to Bowmaster and he is positive his depth was no lower than 234 to 235 feet.  I believe the measurements are correct. Bill’s machine has a scale marked every 1 foot with every 5 feet in large numbers. I measured the core barrel with Joe Stein and it is 22 feet and his rods are 25 feet.  The difference of 3 feet is very important.

After the 3 ½ inch casing was seated, Warnock Hersey started coring with a 2 ½ inch core barrel 5 feet long. They just started coring when it was quite evident that the 3 ½ inch casing was loose and bouncing around. We were using water and no water came back.
We cored for 5 feet but only recovered 2 feet 6 inches which was the top of the hole which we were interested in. It was pure gypsum.

Decided to pull out of the hole and pulled 24 feet of 3 ½ inch casing and casing jammed and machine broke. They took the part to Halifax and didn’t return until Tuesday morning. Tuesday morning Warnock Hersey put down a split spoon and had no recovery. I had made a bailer at the machine shop on Monday and we tried that. The first time he came up with about 2 feet of sand, in which was a small piece of metal, the same as that found with Bill Bowmaster. After repeated tries he came up with about 6 pieces of this small metal and a little piece of the red rag that Bowmaster had used.

A very important point to remember is that when we started with the syfon tube the sand was at 212 feet. The bottom of the hole was 237 feet 6 inches less the 24 feet of casing pulled out which meant that the bottom of the casing was 213 feet 6 inches down.
The recovery while Warnock Hersey was working was sand, gravel and a piece of granite rock every so often. The fact that the metal was still near the bottom of the hole lead me to believe that it was coming from that depth. However later events proved me wrong. It was decided to continue with a churn drill as this would bail out the hole the fastest.
At this time I had to redig the casing down to 15 feet below the surface with a backhoe again so I could weld the 6 inch pipe back on. This was done and backfilled.

We set up over the hole with Harold Verge’s
(14) churn drill and drove the casing down 10 feet to begin with. This meant from 176 feet to 186 feet. He then started to bail out the hole. The sand was so tight that he had to use his drill in order to loosen it up, after which he would alternate with the bailer. The hole was at 210 feet when the churn drill started.
He started bringing up pieces of metal almost immediately and continued until he reached about 232 feet 6 inches and the material was sand, gravel and a small piece of granite rock every so often. We noticed that the bottom of the hole would fill up about 2 feet over night and so drove the casing another 2 feet to 188 feet.

It was thought at this time that the metal was coming from the bottom of the hole and so we decided to blast. We blasted and bailed out a total of 4 times at the bottom of the hole. It was during this time that we started getting clay in pieces and also pieces of gypsum rock. However no metal at all came out. I did get a large amount of cement-like material that later proved to be natural. We then terminated the drilling with Harold Verge and he pulled out.

After consulting with Bill Bowmaster, it was agreed the metal came from higher up. The drilling at 215 feet had been hard and soft with a little drop of 2 feet. I set up a tripod with Gerald Dorey about 30 feet high and rented a gasoline-driven hoist that would pick up about 1200 pounds. Harold Verge loaned me his bailer and his cable, I purchased a case of dynamite in Halifax.

We then started systematically to blast and bail at the bottom of the hole and worked our way up. The blasting was done with two sticks of 2 inch by 8 inch of 75% dynamite using a cap for each stick and this was done every 2 feet and bailed out each time to 232 feet. The total height reached was 215 feet at which point we put a total of 5 sticks 2 inch by 8 inch. After blasting we could hear the rocks falling in, about 4 times and dropped our measuring rock down and found that a total of 12 feet had piled at the bottom of the hole. This was after dark Saturday night and so nobody would get hurt we quit work and started to bail out Monday morning at which time only 6 feet was piled at the bottom of the hole, so the blasting done at the bottom had to be extensive. We bailed the hole out again to 232 feet and not one piece of metal was found. It was then painfully plain that the metal came from higher up behind the casing and that driving the casing had effectively sealed it off as well as sealed the sand and rocks.

The hole was then sealed and the equipment taken back to Halifax. It should also be noted that we made an electric magnet and dropped it to the bottom of the hole before activating and pulled it slowly up the hole without any effect. This was of course done before any blasting.

Conclusions:
  1. The 9 inch rock bit was put down to 195 feet. The casing was taken down to 176 feet leaving 19 feet below, that wasn’t sealed and consequently that’s where the sand, gravel, small pieces of granite rock and pieces of metal came from.
  2. During the churn drilling the casing was eventually driven to 189 feet, sealing off anything from above.
  3. The only material that came from the hole after blasting was clay and pieces of gypsum.”
 
[This ends Dan Blankenship’s report on borehole 10]
 
 So there you have it: borehole 10, (which later became shaft 10X when the hole was widened to accept a 27 inch casing) was first drilled as an open hole using a 9 inch diameter bit through the glacial till and a 6 inch diameter bit through the bedrock. The zone from 217 to 230 feet was drilled without incident, indicating that it was bedrock (15) and a small cavity was found from 230 feet to 233 feet. The big cavity that we know today, which extended from a depth of 217 feet to about 233 feet, was caused by systematically blasting and then bailing out the broken rock from the bottom of the cavity (16). From other field notes prepared by Dan Blankenship, we know that he blasted in this zone a total of 14 times. Here is an illustration which summarizes the blasting:

This is why I started today’s article with a statement that the 10X cavity was man-made. Dan Blankenship created the cavity by blasting, during November 1969. There are no ancient artifacts in this cavity – there couldn’t be. Before 1969, the “cavity” was continuous weathered bedrock. Everything “seen” on video images and sonic surveys in the cavity since 1969 is either recent materials dropped down the 27 inch shaft, or drill casings misinterpreted as support posts, or shadows created by down-hole lights, or pieces of rock that have been misinterpreted as ancient artifacts, a dead body or treasure chests. An early down-hole video seemed to show a horizontal tunnel, but that too has turned out to be another misinterpretation. (17)

  Writing this article has been particularly painful for me. Dan Blankenship is a good man. He has shown himself over and over again to be a hard-working, resourceful and particularly brave Searcher. He has stuck to the Oak Island search for over 50 years and he is still at it. I have met and talked with Dan several times and I am convinced that he is motivated to solve some of the mysteries of Oak Island and I am certain that he has never had any intention of misleading or wasting search efforts on 10X for any underhanded reasons. Dan Blankenship is an honest guy and I do not like reporting in a way that contradicts his observations and beliefs, and yet I think serious readers should know the truth about how 10X was created.

  So why has 10X become the obsession that it seems today, when it is obvious that there is nothing in the cavity?  I think the answer is a result of several things:

When the first 9 inch “open” drill hole was advanced through the glacial till, no remarkable metal pieces or other artifacts were found. But when casing was later installed in the same hole, a double handful of strange metal pieces were recovered as the casing was being advanced. They consisted of bits of “ferrous rolled metal”, according to an expert from Stelco, who examined them.
  These metal pieces, and Dan Blankenship’s observation that the 3.5 inch drill bit fell under its own weight when drilling from 218 to 237.5 convinced him that a treasure cavern had been found. I think he forgot that the 3.5 inch drilling was done in the same hole created by the 6 inch drilling done earlier, and of course the smaller drill string would fall down the larger, previously-drilled hole.

  We know from other field reports, that Dan Blankenship initiated the down-hole blasting activities because he thought the metal and the false appearance of a cavity meant that he had found a treasure-filled cavern and he used explosives to blast open some of the presumed treasure chests, and he bailed the material from the hole after each blast, hoping to recover coins that had been blown from the treasure chests.
 
  At first I thought that the explanation for the metal pieces found at hole 10 in 1969 came from the opening line in Dan’s report to David Tobias: The hole was located “by the door of the old Restall house”. I said to myself: “How did Restall get water for his house??” We know the site is on glacial till, so he must have had a drilled well that went down to the fractured anhydrite bedrock, because no useful amount of water could be recovered from the low permeability till. “Where would the well be located?” I asked myself – and the answer I thought was “close to the back door, no doubt”.  But then I learned that the Restalls did not have a water well. Mildred Restall told a researcher that her boys had to carry fresh water from the swamp, and it had to be boiled before it could be used.
So I’m guessing that the pieces of metal that Dan Blankenship found, could have been pieces of another old well (18) or abandoned drill casing from earlier investigations.  The tungsten carbide teeth of Dan’s modern drilling equipment would have broken up an older, more brittle, partly rusted pipe if it was run into. In fact, the site of an old drilled well or casing could be the explanation of why and how Dan Blankenship found the location for 10X – when he dowsed in the area, the water source for the well and the old metal pipe itself would have been an attractive dowsing target. The pipe used for drilled wells and old drill casings would have been “ferrous rolled metal”, as described by Stelco. That’s how pipes are made – by rolling flat steel sheets, bending them into pipe shapes.

  Another possible source of Dan’s strange metal pieces is that someone could have dropped some old metal down the drill hole after the workers had quit work for the day – such actions do occur occasionally on the most mundane drill project. A further possibility, although I think the probability is remote, is remnants or artifacts of tunneling activity done by the Halifax Company dating from 1866 and 1867. We know that the Halifax Company energetically dug quite a few tunnels at a base depth of 110 feet, in their efforts to locate the Flood Tunnel – but there are no plans or drawings that show where those old workings were constructed.
 
  There is another inconvenient fact relating to hole 10 and shaft 10X. When the hole was widened to about 8 feet in diameter, by installing a steel casing from the surface to a depth of 181 feet, the soil that was excavated was carefully examined. No unusual artifacts or apparent source of the unexplained metal pieces was found in all of that excavated material, although a few small individual metal pieces could possibly have been overlooked.
 
  The main point of interest for serious Searchers at Oak Island has always been the Money Pit. It was bad luck that led Dan Blankenship to find an old water well or drill casing or whatever was the source of the metal pieces, when he dowsed to determine the place to drill hole 10. And it was more bad luck for Dan’s drilling to actually hit part of that old metal, break it up and return strange pieces of metal where he was hoping to find a treasure cavern. That led to high explosive blasting and bailing that created the current cavity – and 45 years of exploration of the deep cavity at 10X, where there are no ancient artifacts or old treasure to be found.
 
  I think it is time to close the book on 10X and focus future work on the Money Pit. No one has explained the wood/clay/wood/6 feet of space sequence under 30 feet of bedrock that was found by the Becker drilling right beside the Money Pit. That is a real mystery with very promising possibilities for treasure Searchers.



Footnotes
  1. A side-looking sonar device was lowered into the cavity on rigid steel rods, by Bill Parkin of Wayland Massachusetts from Oct 22 to 27, 1973. (Parkin was a weapons systems designer for the Pentagon). A “strong, clean and clear signal” was received from the walls of the cavity, and an accurate 2-D image of the hole was obtained at regular intervals from top to bottom. Think of each of these images as a horizontal slice through the cavity. When all of the 2-D images were “stacked”, a 3-D image of the cavity was created, and that image remains the most accurate determination of the shape and size of the cavity.
  2. Borehole #24 was located close to the Money Pit, making Borehole 10 about 180 feet “east” of the Money Pit. Later surveys determined that Borehole 10 was actually located northeast of the Money Pit.
  3. I assume this was a “tri-cone” bit, which has 3 rotating cutter heads made of hardened steel or tungsten-carbide. It would be used to cut through till, boulders and soft rock. Another type of rock bit that was commonly used in those days is a diamond bit, of which there are many designs – but they were normally used in hard bedrock.
  4. The glacial till in this area has been confirmed through later drilling by Golder and others, to contain occasional lenses or pockets of softer silt and clay. What Dan described as a cavity would have been a shallow zone of soft soil where the weight of the drill rods would push the bit through the soil. The drill rods would weigh about 8 pounds per foot, assuming they were HW or similar. So 140 feet of drill string would weigh about 1100 pounds and that weight pushing on a rotating drill bit would cause it to sink right through a soft soil pocket.
  5. Actually we know now that the bedrock is anhydrite, but that is very similar to gypsum. Anhydrite is calcium sulphate (CaSo4), whereas gypsum is the same chemical formula as anhydrite with two bound water molecules, (i.e. CaSo4.2H2O).
  6. It is important to observe that Dan was not using drill casing at this time – he was just drilling what is called an “open hole”. His statement here indicates that he anticipates going back down the hole later if he finds anything interesting, using casing to stabilize the borehole, to prevent soil and rocks from shifting sideways into the hole and thus blocking it.
  7. This was a small cavity in the bedrock, which is different from the cavities that Dan reported finding in the glacial till. See footnote 4. Later drilling in nearby boreholes showed that the anhydrite at this depth contains clay and silt layers.
  8. Bowmaster was the name of the drilling company and also the surname of the driller.
  9. When drilling in an open hole like this, usually there is either air or water (or drilling mud) being forced down the center of the drill rods which exits across the face of the bit (thus cooling it) and then the air or water plus whatever drill cuttings are being generated by the drill, is flushed back up the hole annulus to the surface. It’s very important to constantly watch the return because it might contain interesting items dislodged from the bottom of the hole by the bit. Also if the return is lost, that means that the drill cuttings will be getting stuck somewhere down in the hole, which can quickly cause the drill string to jam and the hole can be lost, along with much of the drill string and bit. “Return” is usually lost because the drilling fluid escapes through fractures or water channels in the bedrock.
  10. Joe Stein was a Geotechnical Technician from Warnock Hersey – see Footnote 12.
  11. These and several other finds of down-hole metal pieces at Hole 10 were later analyzed professionally by experts at Stelco. On August 18, 1970 Stelco commented about the metal pieces found in November 1969: “The steel samples contain slags, but the combination of 0.20C and 0.45 Mn with low phosphorus is very close to a C1020 type steel, and while it may have been early steel, it is unlikely to have been produced prior to 1856.” The bits of rag were just pieces of the red rag that was tied around the bit just before open hole drilling was stopped.
  12. Warnock Hersey was a professional engineering and materials testing company based in Halifax, which hired drilling companies as subcontractors for some investigations. They were engaged by Dan Blankenship to install a smaller diameter casing inside the existing casing which had hung up at 178 feet, and continue casing the hole down to 230 feet. From that point Warnock Hersey were engaged “to sample by coring the rock from 230 to 242.5 feet”. We have the resulting Warnock Hersey engineering report, but it is not directly relevant to this article.
  13. It is important to remember that at this point, Warnock Hersey were drilling down the 9 inch diameter hole previously drilled by Bowmaster to 234 feet. Since Warnock Hersey were using a 3.5 inch drill bit, it’s not surprising that their drill string went down part of the hole under its own weight! Keep reading Dan Blankenship’s report and you will see that the drill string went right down to the bottom of the hole to a depth reported as 237.5 feet. This interval from 218 to 237.5 is very close to the depths where the current 10X cavity is located. Personally I think Dan Blankenship got confused regarding the drilling, and he thought he was drilling through an original cavity when actually he was re-drilling an existing borehole. Having found unusual metal pieces from the till above, and now thinking he had found a 19.5 foot deep cavity, Dan got excited and started to think he may have found a treasure cavern.
  14. Harold Verge was a drilling contractor working for Dan Blankenship.
  15. We now know from other drilling done in the immediate area beside hole 10, that the bedrock zone where the cavity was made, is a very weak zone of weathered anhydrite which contains numerous soil infillings.
  16. See also pages 128 – 136 in “Oak Island and It’s Lost Treasure”, 3rd Edition, by Graham Harris and Les MacPhie, published in 2013 by Formac Publishing. This gives a good summary of activities leading to development of the 10X cavity.
  17. That early video, recorded in 1971, seemed to show the camera entering a circular tunnel, and the possible existence of a horizontal tunnel extending off to the side from the big cavity still remains in some people’s minds. However the camera that made the video had no horizontal movement capability. What was recorded was the camera being lowered vertically into the 21 inch diameter borehole below the big cavity. The tunnel interpretation should have been challenged from the beginning, however it wasn’t.
  18. I think there are a couple of interesting lines of research that ought to be done. We know that John Smith had a house and barn near the Money Pit in very early days. We know from the 1791 poll tax records that there were 5 families living on Oak Island at that time. We know who bought and sold Oak Island lots right back to the Shoreham Grant of 1759. But I don’t think we have a clear understanding of who the first actual settlers on Oak Island were. I think it would be very helpful for future investigations, to know where all of the old houses and barns were located on Oak Island, from the first habitation. I would be interested to know how each of these houses and barns got water for family use and to water the animals that were kept. It’s hard to imagine lugging water from the swamp, to water horses and cattle, assuming they were kept on the island – so I would expect that old barns could have had water wells.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 72

Trending Articles